| |
|
|
Kentucky's Legal Headlines for March 2002
|
-
Links to Recent Courier-Journal Legal
Stories (3.23 -3.31)
-
Links to Recent Courier-Journal Legal
Stories (3.17 -3.23)
- Links to Recent Stories Posted @ www.Courier-Journal.com
(2.25 - 3.16.2002)
- Shane Ragland Murder Trial - Lexington, KY
-
2001 Judicial Evaluations
Only two judges get low ratings in recent bar survey.
Courier-Journal Story 2/7/02.
"Twenty-five of the 27 Jefferson
district and family court judges reviewed in a Louisville
Bar Association survey received mostly favorable overall
ratings from lawyers who practice before them.
Only District Judge Paula Fitzgerald and
Family Court Judge Juda M. Hellmann received a majority of
unfavorable rankings from lawyers who participated in the
survey released yesterday.
Hellmann received favorable ratings from
46 percent of the 158 lawyers who answered the question of
whether she did a good overall job, while Paula Fitzgerald
received favorable ratings from 38 percent of 189 lawyers
who answered that question about her.
All of the other judges in the survey
received favorable ratings on overall performance from at
least 75 percent of the attorneys commenting on them.
Family Court Judge Stephen M. George received favorable
rankings from 97 percent, the highest in the survey."
Click
here for the rest of the Courier-Journal story on 2/7/02.
Click here for last two Courier-Journal
stories on Judicial Evaluations:
2000
- 'Lawyers
rate state, federal judges highly' 2/2001
1999
- 'All
but one judge in Jefferson survey get favorable marks'
2.26.00
Please
note - Paula Fitzgerald is no relation to
Family Court Judge
Patricia
Walker-FitzGerald or Retired Family Court Judge
Richard FitzGerald
- 2002 Judicial Evaluations
Only two judges get low ratings in recent bar survey.
Courier-Journal Story 2/7/02.
"Twenty-five of the 27 Jefferson
district and family court judges reviewed in a Louisville
Bar Association survey received mostly favorable overall
ratings from lawyers who practice before them.
Only District Judge Paula Fitzgerald and
Family Court Judge Juda M. Hellmann received a majority of
unfavorable rankings from lawyers who participated in the
survey released yesterday.
Hellmann received favorable ratings from
46 percent of the 158 lawyers who answered the question of
whether she did a good overall job, while Fitzgerald
received favorable ratings from 38 percent of 189 lawyers
who answered that question about her.
All of the other judges in the survey
received favorable ratings on overall performance from at
least 75 percent of the attorneys commenting on them.
Family Court Judge Stephen M. George received favorable
rankings from 97 percent, the highest in the survey."
- 94%
of Web-Voters Think Voters Should Have A Right To Know the
Positions of Judicial Candidates On Controversial Issues
-
Does a candidate for
judge surrender his/her right to free speech by
running for judicial office?
-
Do voters have a right
to know something
more about candidates for judge?
-
Kentucky's Position?
-
From the Fayette County
Prosecutor's Office Web Site
-
Epilogue to this
story (Jan. 16, 2002)(Editorial)
Last week I read an editorial from Betty Baye in
the Courier Journal (click
here for editorial). Without addressing all of the
putative ethical and legal arguments on campaigning by
the judiciary, I thought about it from the
electorate's perspective. She addressed a skit
by Jay Leno, host of NBC's "Tonight
Show," when he went out into the streets to test
passersby's knowledge of people in the news. The
anecdotal evidence from this skit was that in the
heart of New York City in the middle of this
Information Age with hundreds of cable tv channels,
the Internet, Newspapers, magazines, etc., that Jay
was able to readily find people who were unable to
identify pictures of Osama bin Laden, Vice President
Dick Cheney, Attorney General John Ashcroft and
National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice.
Now what does that have to do with judicial
elections? A lot. The Kentucky
Constitution mandates judges will be elected by the
people, but what do the people have to base that
selection or election on?
-
Issues? NO. Can't
talk about them.
-
Partisanship or judicial party
(for some idea of the candidates affiliation and
views)? NOPE. Can't talk or disclose that either.
-
Name recognition? Yes.
That's about it. If the voter has heard the
name some where, some time, some place, some how,
then that may very well be the only basis for
making that vote in local elections.
-
Take a look at the local Jefferson
County judges. How many -
-
Are related to each
other?
-
Have the same names of others
(without being related)?
-
Are related to
non-judicial public officials?
-
Have the same
name or are related to former judges or
politicians?
-
Is this a judicial election,
selection, or coronation?
-
Judicial elections with no discussion of issues, limitations on fund raising,
failure to have media and other events to get the
candidates before the public result in nothing
more than popularity contests. Why can't you
let the folks know the candidate is a democrat,
republican, etc.? It gives them more
information than they have now which is nice name,
nice face, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
View your CLE credits online
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Disclaimer
We are not attempting to practice law, give advice or represent ourselves as
anything more than a resource portal with many unique features. Our design is
copyrighted. We have no claim of any affiliation with any linked website nor any
liability for anything they may say or do. We, and our contributing authors,
offer no warranties of any type, to anyone, about anything express or implied.
What you see is what you get, we cannot afford to be your insurer and most
assuredly are not your lawyer and do not render you any legal advice
whatsoever. No attorney client relationship is established by this site,
and there is absolutely no confidentiality of any information or communication
herein. No emails received will be responded to pertaining to legal
questions or advice.
By going further into this site, you accept this complete waiver of all
warranties and acknowledge reading our Legal
Disclaimer.
© 2001-2004 LouisvilleLaw,
LouisvilleLaw.com
& Kentucky Law Net, LLC
"The Kentucky Lawyer" is a registered Service Mark of Kentucky Law Net LLC.
LouisvilleLaw, LouisvilleLaw.com, Louisville LawWire,
eLegal Summaries & LouisvilleLawyers are service marks
and the intellectual property of Kentucky Law Net LLC. 2001-2004
To Suggest a Link or Report broken Links, please contact our Webmaster
Number of Hits Since June 1, 2001
|
|
|
|
kentucky, legal news, legal, law, information,
lawyers, lawyer, attorney, attorneys, verdicts, settlements, cases,
court, courts, judge, judges
|
|
|