 |
|
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
What's New?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kentucky
Court
of Appeals - NOT TO BE PUBLISHED DECISIONS -
rest of April 2003
|
|
Civil
|
2001-CA-000881.pdf
Size: 23 kb
Date: 4/24/2003
|
Negligence,
Workers Comp, Up the Ladder, Res Judicata,
Collateral Estoppel
This is an interesting case on how res
judicata and collateral estoppel do not
apply from a workers comp case to a
personal injury case flowing from the same
incident. Basically, employee was
working for Ryder when hurt at
Toyota. In the Workers Comp case, it
was ruled not a work-related injury.
However, in the BI case later, Toyota
raised the Workers Comp defense of
"up the ladder" and the circuit
court granted sum. judgement. Since
Toyotal was not a party to the Workers
Comp claim, res judicata and collateral
estoppel (claims preclusion) not apply.
Result - ALJ said no work related injury
and dismissed claim; circuit judge ruled
it was workers comp and dismssed the
action. Catch 22! |
2002-CA-000601.pdf
Size: 19 kb
Date: 4/24/2003
|
Affirmed
commissioners sale of property - no abuse
of discretion |
2002-CA-000664.pdf
Size: 42 kb
Date: 4/24/2003
|
Objections
to mediator's report regarding
substantial repair and sale of
property. Affirmed trial courts'
findings of fact etc. |
2002-CA-000708.pdf
Size: 21 kb
Date: 4/16/2003
|
Admissibility
of evidence - videotaped surveillance of
commercial property showing trespasser. |
2002-CA-000741.pdf
Size: 19 kb
Date: 4/16/2003
|
Appeals.
Delay damages pursuant to KRS 26A.300
and CR 76.20(9)(a).
|
2002-CA-000756.pdf
Size: 44 kb
Date: 4/10/2003
|
Contract
interpretation - exclusive agency. |
2002-CA-000763.pdf
Size: 24 kb
Date: 4/24/2003
|
Interpretation
of restrictions in deeds. |
2002-CA-000794.pdf
Size: 36 kb
Date: 4/10/2003
|
Administrative
law - pollution control - tax
exemptions. |
2002-CA-000842.pdf
Size: 27 kb
Date: 4/16/2003
|
Defamation
- limited public figure exception and
commonwealth's attorney. |
2002-CA-000899.pdf
Size: 22 kb
Date: 4/24/2003
|
Taxation
- city ordinances - culverts and city
improvements. |
2002-CA-000933.pdf
Size: 27 kb
Date: 4/3/2003
|
Administrative
law - real estate brokers license -
denial. |
2002-CA-001170.pdf
Size: 17 kb
Date: 4/24/2003
|
Judgment
- finality - amending to add costs after
10 days too late. |
2002-CA-001283.pdf
Size: 25 kb
Date: 4/24/2003
|
Employment
law - work place harassment. |
2002-CA-001351.pdf
Size: 41 kb
Date: 4/24/2003
|
Service
of process - dismissal for failure to
serve under CR 4 - no exception for good
faith failure to serve - dismissal for
lack of prosecution affirmed. |
2002-CA-001371.pdf
Size: 16 kb
Date: 4/24/2003
|
Appeals
- not final and appealable (family law
division of pension order did not
contain final and appealable language
and other issues remained
pending). |
|
|
Workers Compensation
|
|
|
|
Criminal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cases
In Context
|
- Auto Liability Insurance -
Primary-Excess-Escape Clauses
- KRS 304.20-065 -replacement vehicle
coverage
The insured's collision coverage, if
any, will extend to a loaned vehicle if the
insured's negligence causes damage to such
vehicle and the insured's vehicle is out of
use because of breakdown, repair or
servicing AND if the loaned vehicle is
provided by a person, firm or corporation
engaged in the business of selling,
repairing or servicing motor vehicles.
- KRS 190.033
While insured is operating a dealer's
vehicle (loaner etc), the dealer's property
damage liability coverage is excess to the
insured property damage coverage for the
insured's own negligence.
- Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v.
Haddix, Ky. App., 927 S.W.2d 843 (1996)
Where two insurance
companies are contesting primary
liability, and one policy contains a
nonstandard escape
clause while the other contains an excess
clause, the escape
clause prevails over the excess
clause.
Escape
clause in dealership's garage policy
prevailed over excess
clause in driver's personal policy
such that driver's personal insurer had primary
obligation to defend and indemnify driver in
suit arising from accident occurring while
driver was operating temporary substitute
vehicle rented from dealership.
- Geico v. Globe Indemnity Ins. Co., Ky., 415
S.W.2d 581 (1967)
Held full liability on claim within
policy limits fell on permissive driver's
insurer, relieving owner's insurer, where
both policies contained "excess
insurance" clauses but owner's policy
in addition contained "escape
clause" providing that policy would not
cover person other than named insured and
his employees if other valid and collectible
insurance, either primary or excess, was
available to such person.
- Ohio Casualty Ins. Co. v. State Farm
Mut.
Auto. Ins. Co., Ky., 511 S.W.2d 671 (1974)
Where both policies had the same type of
"escape" clauses, then both the
garage policy and the customer's policy
would be liable jointly to the limits of the
smaller coverage, and the insurer with the
larger limits would pay the amount in excess
of the smaller coverage up to its limits.
- Royal Globe Ins.Co. v. Safeco Ins. Co. of
America, Ky. App., 560 S.W.2d 22 (1977)
Compulsory insurance laws are intended
to protect public at large who might
otherwise suffer from being injured by
uninsured motor vehicles, and are not
intended to protect other insurance
companies; when controversy is between two
insurers, liability for loss should be
determined by terms and provisions of
respective policies without regard to rights
that injured third parties might assert
under compulsory insurance law.
Where injuries were caused by automobile
temporarily furnished by automobile dealer
to its customer and driven by another person
with customer as passenger, and automobile
dealer's liability policy contained
"escape" clause and the customer's
liability insurer policy contained an
"excess" clause, then the
customer's policy afforded primary coverage
to driver for liability resulting from
injuries caused by accident. If both
policies had contained "excess"
clauses, then both would have applied
pro-rata.
- Rees v. USG & G, Ky. App., 715 S.W.2d
904 (1986)
Escape clause in insurer's policy
relieved insurer of coverage for tort
liability of substitute vehicle involved in
accident, but did not relieve insurer the
garage of basic reparation benefits
liability.
- State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hall, Ky., 165
S.W.2ds 838 (1942)
Affirmed clause making liability coverage
excess for insured driving non-owned
vehicle.
- State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v. Register, Ky.
App., 583 S.W.2d 705 (1979)
The court held that both
"escape" clauses were mutually
repugnant and, teach company would be
required to bear one half of expense of
settlement of claim. Customer's policy
provided no coverage to non-owned
automobiles owned by persons engaged in
automobile business, and the garage policy
provided no coverage to garage customers who
had available other insurance, whether
primary, excess or contingent.
- Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v.
Veljkovic, Ky. App., 613 S.W.2d 426 (1980)
Motor vehicle dealer's liability
policy's "escape" clause could not
circumvent the minimum limits required by
KRS 190.033 (which now provide $100/300/50).
|
|
|
|
Courier-Journal
Law-Related On-Line Stories -
May 6 -11, 2003
|
|
No Good Deed Goes Unnoticed
IRAQI LAWYER WHO AIDED POW IS HONORED
Associated Press
An Iraqi lawyer who helped U.S. troops rescue
prisoner of war Jessica Lynch was honored Thursday
by a state lawyers' group. The Delaware Bar Association
said the award granted to Mohammed Odeh al-Rehaief,
32, reflects the best quality of lawyers - helping
defenseless people being treated
unfairly.
http://news.findlaw.com/ap/o/1110/5-8-2003/20030508193003_28.html
Gee, Do You Think That Response Is Gonna' Work?
JUDGE REPRIMANDED FOR TEACHER COMMENTS
Associated Press
A judge who spurred outrage for saying he failed to
see the harm in a sexual
encounter between a teacher and student has been
reprimanded. Superior Court Judge Bruce A. Gaeta
violated the canons of the bench by making
statements expressing a bias during sentencing, the
Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct found in a
ruling released Thursday. Gaeta will remain on the
bench, the panel said, because although the remarks
were inappropriate, they were isolated and not
likely to be repeated.
http://news.findlaw.com/ap/o/1110/5-8-2003/20030508220004_04.html
Jury
Awards $51M in Accidental Shooting
The Recorder
An Oakland, Calif., jury, which awarded $50.9
million Wednesday to a 16-year-old boy, also decided
gun maker Bryco Arms is at least one-third liable in
the shooting that left the boy a quadriplegic. The
award comes just as members of Congress are
considering legislation that would limit liability
in suits like this one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|