Issue  2003/5 - Mar. 9, 2003    

 Table of Contents
 What's New?
  • I give.  I'm going to try posting all of the Supreme's published and non-published opinions, but I can't do all of the Court of Appeals.  If some criminal lawyer out there wishes to volunteer, please come forward.  In the meantime, only civil cases from the court of appeals are posted.  Sorry.
  • We have ALL of February's Supreme Court links posted.
  • We have only about half the civil cases are posted for the court of appeals for Feb.
  • Want to get ALL of the opinion links for the month?  EZ.  Go to the KyCourts.net page of the AOC; click on the Supreme Court or Court of Appeals links; click on Searchable opinions; and select the court and type in --- Rendered w/3 february w/3 2003 (or march or whatever).  You will find over 180 opinions for the court of appeals for the month of february.
 Kentucky Supreme Court  - February 1 - 28, 2003 - Published and NonPublished
1997-SC-000842-MR.pdf
Size: 1545 kb
Date: 2/17/2003
Johnson v. Commonwealth
Criminal Law

Providency of Guilty Pleas, Boykin, Preserving Errors, Competency to Plead Guilty
Multiple errors raised following guilty plea in murder case; all failed; affirmed.
2000-SC-000992-TG.pdf
Size: 390 kb
Date: 2/17/2003
Not to be Published
Gray v. Commonwealth
Criminal Law
Batson Peremptory Strikes, Failure to Grant Continuance, Double Jeopary for Evading and Fleeing.  Conviction affirmed.
2000-SC-001055-DG.pdf
Size: 359 kb
Date: 2/19/2003
Sringer v. Reality Unlimited Inc  (Reissued)
Zoning
Subdivision, Plat Approval, Sewage
2001-SC-000032-MR.pdf
Size: 734 kb
Date: 2/17/2003
Not to be Published
Johnson v. Commonwealth
Criminal Law
Custodial Interrogation & Juveniles Separate Trials
2001-SC-000506-TG.pdf
Size: 576 kb
Date: 2/17/2003
Not to be Published
Gribbins v. Commonwealth
Criminal Law
Search and Seizure, Plain View - Plain Feel, Pat Down
2001-SC-000672-TG.pdf
Size: 758 kb
Date: 2/17/2003
Not to be Published
Newsome v. Commonwealth
Criminal Law
Prior bad acts; Dissent filed by J. Graves.
2001-SC-000669-DG.pdf
Size: 864 kb
Date: 2/7/2003
Commonwealth V. Whitmore (Amended)
2001-SC-000692-DG.pdf
Size: 327 kb
Date: 2/17/2003
Not to be Published
Commonwealth v. Isham
Criminal Law
2001-SC-000803-MR.pdf
Size: 1346 kb
Date: 2/17/2003
Johnson v. Commonwealth
Criminal Law
Murder, Multiple Errors Raised but Conviction Affirmed
2001-SC-000825-MR.pdf
Size: 644 kb
Date: 2/17/2003
Not to be Published
Kiskaden v. Commonwalth
Criminal
Lay Opinion Testimony of forensic nurse - Defendant objected to nurse testimony as conclusions rather than not qualified as expert testimony. Parol evidence rule
2002-SC-000159-MR.pdf
Size: 237 kb
Date: 2/17/2003
Not to be Published
Violett v. Peckler
Criminal
Manadamus to disqualify counsel in case
2002-SC-000207-WC.pdf
Size: 654 kb
Date: 2/17/2003
Not to be Published
Miller v. Commonwealth Revenue Cabinet
Worker Compensation
"Traveling employee" exception to the "coming and going rule" examined.
2002-SC-000214-WC.pdf
Size: 526 kb
Date: 2/17/2003
Tanks v. Roark
Worker Compensation
AMA Guidelines and hearing loss as occupational disease
2002-SC-000287-WC.pdf
Size: 424 kb
Date: 2/17/2003
Not to be Published
Martin County Coal v. Dude
Worker Compensation
Total disability award given by ALJ without commenting on uncontradicted vocation expert information
2002-SC-000354-MR.pdf
Size: 354 kb
Date: 2/17/2003
Not to be Published
Gleen v. Commonwealth
Criminal
Bolstering of victim testimony
2002-SC-000389-WC.pdf
Size: 453 kb
Date: 2/17/2003
Not to be Published
Kirk and Blum v. Hobbs
Worker Compensation
KRS 342.0011(11) and total disability interpreted.
2002-SC-000396-WC.pdf
Size: 583 kb
Date: 2/17/2003
Not to be Published
Same as Kirk and Blum v. Hobbs
2002-SC-000437-MR.pdf
Size: 394 kb
Date: 2/17/2003
Not to be Published
Humphrey v. Commonwealth
Criminal Law
2002-SC-000450-WC.pdf
Size: 261 kb
Date: 2/17/2003
Not to be Published
Mosley v. BWI Book Wholesaler
Worker Compensation
2002-SC-000885-MR.pdf
Size: 121 kb
Date: 2/17/2003
Not to be Published
Shields v. Commonwealth
Criminal Law
2000-SC-000130-MR.pdf
Size: 692 kb
Date: 2/18/2003
Not to be Published
Brasher v. Commonwealth
Criminal Law
 Kentucky Court of Appeals - February 1 - 28, 2003 - NonPublished
2000-CA-000644.pdf
Size: 63 kb
Date: 2/6/2003
Not to be Published
Malone v. Commonwealth
Government Employment
Relationship between dismissal and self-incrimination.
2000-CA-001926.pdf
Size: 17 kb
Date: 2/20/2003
Not to be Published
Ginter v. Ware
No merit to appeal
2000-CA-002275.pdf
Size: 47 kb
Date: 2/6/2003
Not to be Published
Gallagher v. Conyer
Family Law
Joint custody not awarded when future cooperation remote. Failure to properly designate portions of the record for appeal. Brandenburg formula applied to marital/nonmarital property.
2000-CA-002838.pdf
Size: 23 kb
Date: 2/20/2003
Not to be Published
Nutrition Rich Prod. v. Nutritional Resources, Inc.
Business Law
Business was 'alter ego' of its owners and corporate veil pierced permitting attachment of assets.
2001-CA-000484.pdf
Size: 51 kb
Date: 2/6/2003
Not to be Published
Holland v. Ky Retirement Systems
Government Disability Benefits
2001-CA-000694.pdf
Size: 39 kb
Date: 2/6/2003
Not to be Published
Board of Dentistry v. Goodman
Professions
Reviewed propriety of action taken against dentist who allowed hygenist to polish teeth.
2001-CA-000721.pdf
Size: 34 kb
Date: 2/20/2003
Not to be Published
Scully v. American Airlines
Jurisdiction
Airline passengers can't sue in state court for personal injuries due to preemption by federal law (Warsaw Convention).  
2001-CA-000816.pdf
Size: 36 kb
Date: 2/6/2003
Not to be Published
Logan Aluminum v. Bullard
Workers Compensation
2001-CA-000977.pdf
Size: 23 kb
Date: 2/27/2003
Not to be Published
Taylor v. Wheeler
Summary Judgment
Plaintiff failed to answer expert interrogatories or identify facts or experts in support of his claim for medical negligence.  Summary judgment dismissing claim affirmed.  Plaintiff claimed his nurse consultant was ill and unable to provide names and court should have given him extension.
2001-CA-000991.pdf
Size: 33 kb
Date: 2/6/2003
Not to be Published
Fields v. Fulton County Board of Levee
Cutting Timber on the Levee & Color of Title
2001-CA-001021.pdf
Size: 35 kb
Date: 2/27/2003
Not to be Published

Recommend you read this one. 
Bayless v. St. Elizabeth Med. Center
Adequacy of Damages, New Trial, Medical Malpractice

Miller v. Swift issues on zero pain and suffering when medicals awarded against doctor in med mal - judge denied new trial - affirmed.  Judge's ruling was not clearly erroneous.  Note the court addressed the jury's decision determining no additional pain and suffering.  Other basis for new trial that jury disregarded uncontroverted evidence was shot down too.  Note the claims of med mal were based on radiologists misdiagnosing fracture such that surgery rather than a cast was now required.  One doctor admitted mistake; another doctor did not (jury agreed).  Result was negligence apportioned against the radiologist who admitted his error and the minor's parents.
2001-CA-001026.pdf
Size: 40 kb
Date: 2/6/2003
Not to be Published
Good one to read.
Transportation Cabinet v. Pelphrey
Board of Claims
Diminution of value to land.  Applicability of civil rules in board of claims action on 'appeal' to circuit court since it is an original action.
2001-CA-001360.pdf
Size: 27 kb
Date: 2/13/2003
Not to be Published

Good one to read.
McDowell v. Our Lady of Bellefonte Hosp.
Medical Malpractice, Evidence
No error to exclude evidence of plaintiff/patient's failure to have insurance to show physician's motive for not conducting certain tests (court also relied on case where expert witness and defendant physician were insured by same malpractice carrier was properly excluded to show bias).  Plaintiff also failed to preserve error by avowal where court excluded his expert witness's testimony about standard of care on the basis that it was not disclosed in interrogatory responses or at his deposition 

Comment:  Of course, could this same analysis apply to CR 26.02 disclosures of other experts regarding the specificity of the opinions actually disclosed?  Note how often, the disclosure is nothing more than the expert will testify about general need for future medicals or impairments without specifics.  This is a good one read just for a reminder of the hurdles to jump in medical malpractice cases even after you find the expert witnesses!

2001-CA-001457.pdf
Size: 52 kb
Date: 2/6/2003
Not to be Published

Good one to read.
Louisville & Jefferson County MSC v. Becker
Condemnation
Good words said about Judge Abramson's opinion and who denied MSD's petition to condemn sewer pipe for failure to make reasonable effort to acquire property by private sale.
2001-CA-001471.pdf
Size: 53 kb
Date: 2/20/2003
Not to be Published

Good one to read.
McCarty v. Boswell
Medical Malpractice, Experts, Daubert, Res Ipsa Loquitor
Plaintiff sued for misdiagnosis - pathologist diagnosed cancer in the jaw and given one year to live, patient had chemo, patient got better, pathologist reexamined and now his opinion was inconclusive; only problem for patient was terrible regimen of chemo.  This case is now nearly 10 years old and went through at least 3 plaintiff's lawyers.  Plaintiff had his expert problems - on deposition by defendants, one stated he never looked at the slides and not his area; and another was qualified buy only would say he would not have reached that conclusion but would not say it deviated from standard of care.  First expert did not meet the Daubert challenge. Next, SJ affirmed for failing to prosecute and not diclosing experts (too bad you kept losing your lawyers and had no money to get experts!). Finally, the haven of res ipsa loquitor provided no respite, and court did not buy argument that the defendant doctor admitted a deviation from standard of care by changing his report from cancer to inconclusive or by sending out the sample to a medical school of doctors who were unsure too. No res ipsa cases cited to support a missed diagnosis med-mal case.
2001-CA-001486.pdf
Size: 43 kb
Date: 2/6/2003
Cabinet for Human Services v. Family Home Health Plan
Professions
Addressed government's denial of a certificate of need for mobile IV unit.
2001-CA-001572.pdf
Size: 23 kb
Date: 2/27/2003
Not to be Published
Willoughby v. Jones
Contempt
Property line and easement dispute between two neighbors and their driveway.
2001-CA-001600.pdf
Size: 30 kb
Date: 2/6/2003
Not to be Published
Lawson v. Haynes
Estates, Breach of Contract Between Decedents, Res Judicata
(Nothing real major here).
2001-CA-001601.pdf
Size: 27 kb
Date: 2/20/2003
Not to be Published
Dauley v. Hops of Bowling Green
Employment
At will employee did not have a fiduciary relationship with employer and no wrongful discharge under public policy exception to terminable at will rule.
2001-CA-001617.pdf
Size: 35 kb
Date: 2/6/2003
Not to be Published
In the Interest of X.B. v. Commonwealth
Family Law, Juvenile
Involved placement of juvenile with Dept. of Juvenile Justice.
2001-CA-001646.pdf
Size: 25 kb
Date: 2/20/2003
Not to be Published
Thornton Oil v. Perconti
Contracts
This case involved the Thornton Oil executive who was convicted of fraud etc. and his claim for retirement benefits previously agreed to before he went astray.
2001-CA-001694.pdf
Size: 43 kb
Date: 2/27/2003
Not to be Published
Louisville and Jefferson County MSD v. 3-D Enterprises
Mechanics Liens
Addressed MSD dispute and liens with a contractor doing 'bioroughing' stuff.
2001-CA-001729.pdf
Size: 48 kb
Date: 2/13/2003
Guepel Construction v. Transportation Cabinet
Government Procurement, Appeals
2001-CA-001766.pdf
Size: 52 kb
Date: 2/6/2003
Not to be Published
Good Daubert Analysis.
Scott v. Grimes
Medical Malpractice, Daubert Hearing
Reversed.  Judge erred in disallowing expert causation testimony regarding HRT and relationship to plaintiff's stroke.
2001-CA-001826.pdf
Size: 58 kb
Date: 2/6/2003
Not to be Published
Reece v. Blevins
Contracts, Options, Installment Land Contract
Interpreted agreement with parol evidence, option to buy in lease. Folks in Munfordville were selling their house when husband was going into military and entered into this contract with neighbor.  Paid rent for three years, but at the end the 'sellers' did not want to sell.  Renter/buyer not enthused and sued.
2001-CA-001835.pdf
Size: 26 kb
Date: 2/6/2003
Not to be Published
Worth a read
Rogers v. Blair
Family Law
Upheld constitutionality of Kentucky's de facto custodian statute (grandparents) which provides due process.  Looked at US Sup. Ct. case and other Kentucky cases.  
2001-CA-001925.pdf
Size: 22 kb
Date: 2/27/2003
Not to be Published
Gideon v. Samaritan Hospital
Pleadings
Pro se plaintiff's failure to properly name hospital in complaint was fatally defective.
2001-CA-001960.pdf
Size: 29 kb
Date: 2/13/2003
Not to be Published
Young v. Kentucky Speedway
Taxation, Government Bonds
Dealt with bonds to fund Kentucky Speedway.
2001-CA-002014.pdf
Size: 19 kb
Date: 2/6/2003
Not to be Published
Spinks v. Holder Cemetery
Real Property
Addressed adverse possession rules in boundary dispute.
2001-CA-002020.pdf
Size: 30 kb
Date: 2/20/2003
Not to be Published
Faulkner v. Faulkner
Family Law
Trial court failed to enter findings in support of deviation from child support guidelines when child support recalculated and requiring one spouse to pay mortgage.
2001-CA-002056.pdf
Size: 23 kb
Date: 2/27/2003
Not to be Published
Link v. Fass
Instructions
Defendant failed to preserve error regarding apportionment instruction against co-defendant in real estate purchase regarding damages to house which were occurred after purchase/inspection but not discovered until after closing.
2001-CA-002061.pdf
Size: 36 kb
Date: 2/20/2003
Not to be Published

Read this one.

Moorhead v. Manning Equipment
Attorneys Fees
Plaintiff obtained verdict on lease-purchase agreement which awarded her damages, pre-judgment interest, and costs.  Plaintiff did not seek attorneys fees till after judgment claiming entitled to atty fees for defending judgment on appeal or post-verdict.  Trial court did not have jurisdiction after verdict since attorneys fees not raised at trial and entitlement to attorneys fees was not ancillary to the action (such as divorce or civil rights) but was part of the contract. 
2001-CA-002086.pdf
Size: 49 kb
Date: 2/27/2003
Not to be Published
Johnson v. Scripps Co.
Defamation, Public Figure
2001-CA-002149.pdf
Size: 29 kb
Date: 2/13/2003
Not to be Published
City of Sparta v. Kentucky Speedway
Annexation
Strict and not substantial compliance with statute required.
2001-CA-002191.pdf
Size: 71 kb
Date: 2/6/2003
Not to be Published

Good one to read.

Adams Real Estate Ltd Partnership v. King
Real Estate
Real estate transferred by partner (grandfather) to his grandson may not meet requirements for recordation, but can pass title as to the individuals concerned and those with actual notice.  Here grand-dad had simply writing to give houses to his grandson.  Court addressed issues regarding document transferring property, authority of partner to transfer property owned by real estate partnership, constructive trust, etc.
2001-CA-002192.pdf
Size: 35 kb
Date: 2/20/2003
Not to be Published
Smith v. J.C. Lee and Sons
Negligence, Jury Misconduct
Plaintiff's sued cow owner whose cow left the farm and got hit by a car.  Jury found no negligence (affirmed), and allegation of jury misconduct because they were out only four minutes and did not read instructions was not substantiated in the record.  Basically, plaintiff met burden of showing negligence which shifted to defendant cow-owner that he was not negligent and jury bought the evidence.  Plaintiff loses (no negligence per se as hoped for by plaintiff).  Cow jumps ove the moon, hits car, ouch.
 The Big List - Largest Jury Verdicts in Kentucky
Here are the biggest verdicts for 2003 based upon publication in the Kentucky Trial Court Review for this year (as opposed to actual dates of the verdicts).  To order your monthly Kentucky jury civil verdicts, call 1-877-313-1944.  Price is $160.
  1. $27,335,667
    Tyler Thompson, Louisville
    Garbage Truck Negligence
  2. $24,268,261 (prior to 50% apportionment) - Medical Malpractice
    Lee Sitlinger and Charles Theiler, Louisville
  3. $4,352,31;6
    Keith B. Hunter and Laurence Zielke, Louisville
    Employment Retaliation - Defamation
  4. $300,000
    Paul Schachter and Penny Hendy, Fort Mitchell
    Medical Negligence
  5. $196,800
    Debra Doss and William Davis, Lexington
    Employment Retaliation
 Kentucky Trial Court Review - January 2003 - 7 KTCR 1
  • Lottery Loses Litigation Over Lost Job
    Louisville lawyers, Keith Hunter and Laurence Zielke score big in an employment retaliation and defamation case when husband and wife were lottery employees alleging they were fired  in retaliation for supporting a discrimination claim filed by a fellow lottery employee who was blind.

    Kim and Bob Hill were married and worked for the lottery for 10 years. Kim was willing testify favorably for a fellow employee who claim he was fired because of a disability (blind). Kim claims the lottery bosses put pressure on her;  she withstood the pressure and testified.  Both she and her husband were later discharged for reasons relating to credit card misuse.  Kim and Bob sued claiming the credit card claim was a pretext. Jury agreed with her and awarded Kim and Bob $1,697,866 and $2,654,450 respectively.

    KTCR waxed eloquent and noted the bizarre twist of the case in which the lawsuit really was a lottery and not just the get-rich-scheme allegation oft-times raised by the defense bar.  On a bizarre twist, the blind employee lost his disability discrimination claim (also represented by Hunter).  The lotto folks accommodated the blind employee with a voice-activated system and a large contrast monitor for his computer.

    Moral of the story is - win some, lose some; or rolls your dices and takes your chances.  Applies equally to the plaintiff's lawyers (Hunter) and the defense lawyers (Jan West).  
  • Zero Pain and Suffering Verdict in Aggravation of Prior Disc Injury
    Mildred Hess, age 82, was hit by Mary Swan on Preston Hwy.  Minor damage to the car and defendant stipulated fault.  Defendant claimed prior disc and minor damage.  Dr. Harkess testified per IME that the plaintiff's problems were related to her advanced age and not the MVA.  Plaintiff passed the $1,000 threshhold instruction and was awarded all of her medicals but nothing for pain and suffering.  

    Until then, business as usual.  However, things got curiouser during post-trial.  Trying to get past the Miller v. Swift problem, the plaintiff's lawyer raised (1) Mildred was old but she didn't need a cane until she was hit; (2) her doctor found a new injury on top of the disc; (3) (and this is the new one) the defense attorney conceded pain and suffering in his closing argument.  The defense response?  The plaintiff had prior conditions (just as in Swift) and besides closing arguments are not evidence.

    Two jury questions of note. (1) Howza bout some classical music instead of that white noise when y'all go up to the bench?  (2) Any insurance to pay those medicals?

    KTCR commentary noted Justice Graves' dissent in Swift - a 'bulls eye' on the old and infirm who can be too old to have any pain and suffering in the hands of a wrongdoer.

    Well, yes and no.  Prior existing conditions can exist in all and degenerative problems can occur in folks half Ms. Hess' age.  Don't forget the minor impact, too.  Prior to Miller v. Swift, Justice William Cooper (in his days as a Hardin Circuit Court trial judge) would use an instruction indicating that if the jury awarded the plaintiff any medicals, then they must award them something for pain and suffering.  This instruction made perfect sense prior to Miller v. Swift, but now I don't think so since the jury can award nothing if you can assert pre-existing complaints and no aggravation; the medicals were mostly diagnostic rather than treatment; or a superceding or external cause of the problems; the plaintiff is a malingerer or worse yet, a liar.
 Encrypting Your E-mail
  • www.ZipLip.com
  • Want to be able to send someone an encrypted email without going to the bother of the complicated stuff?  Go to ZipLip and open a free web based account.  You can buy a bigger account or have pop access or even have pop access with your own domain name - but at a fee.
  • How does it work?  
    • Register for an account.  Yourname@ZipLip.com or whatever.
    • It then works like HotMail and other web based email.  When you want to send an encrypted email, you go to ziplip.com, sign in under services (user name and password), then compose your email (or copy the text into the body of it), type in the receiver's email address, and make sure you send it secured.
    • You will then be prompted for a password and a clue.  You can give the password to the recipient over the phone etc or pick something easy like their first name etc (failure to coordinate and leave them guessing may cause delays>>>).
    • It's then sent to them.  If the recipient types in the password, they see the email.
    • Note - you can send attachements AND the recipient does not need ziplip account to read the email.
    • Cool.  Use it for sensitive and personal stuff.

 Courier-Journal Law-Related On-Line Stories - Feb 17 - Mar 8, 2003

 
Click here for list maintenance