Issue  2003/2 - Jan. 19, 2003    

 Table of Contents
 What's New?
 Kentucky Supreme Court - Jan. 18, 2003
2001-SC-000245-TG.pdf
Size: 797 kb
Date: 1/13/2003
Modified earlier opinion
Johnson v. Commonwealth
Criminal Law, Directed Verdict, Sentencing
Case dealt with defining 'constructive possession' of firearm, limited admissibility of shotgun to show possession of the handguns, and defendant can waive maximum sentence limitations in plea agreement.
2001-SC-000302-TG.pdf
Size: 799 kb
Date: 1/13/2003
Same as above.
 Kentucky Court of Appeals - Jan 18, 2003
1999-CA-002774
Size: 28 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Perkins v. Commonwealth
Criminal Law, Sexual Offender Registration, Experts
Relying on Hyatt v. Commonwealth, defendant was entitled to funds to hire expert for risk assessment hearing.
2000-CA-001867.pdf
Size: 74 kb
Date: 1/17/2003
Not To Be Published
Total Distribution Servics v. CSX
Negligence, Independent Contractors, Restatement Torts 324A, Seat Belt Expert
Not error to have denied directed verdict; ample evidence to find contractor hired by owner owed duty to subcontractor's employees.  Use of seat belt relevant on apportionment even when unloading trucks at Ford plant.
2000-CA-00230
Size: 31 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Korfhage v. Prell (consolidated appeals)
Divorce, Settlement Agreements
Parties bound by agreement reached at prehearing settlement conference on appeal regarding disposition of real estate by quit claim deed.  Facts in record supported client's consent to agreement.
2000-CA-002436
Size: 26 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
McWhorter v. Commonwealth
Criminal Law, Sentencing
Judge is not bound by jury's sentencing recommendation and could change concurrent to consecutive sentences, effectively doubling time.
2001-CA-000946
Size: 34 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Larrison v. Hebron Auto Sales
Warranties, Summary Judgment/Motion to Dismiss
Express warranty in sale of auto can be abrogated by "as is" sale language. Motion to dismiss affirmed.
2001-CA-000986
Size: 33 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Combs v Smith
Real Estate, Warranty, Fraud
Buyer believed seller had not made all repairs to house damaged from fire after porch roof collapsed. Bench trial awarded buyer $11,000.  Caveat emptor applies sale of home and no implied warranty unless sale of new home (not so here); therefore, claim must rest on warranty, fraud, or concealment.  Judge's findings of fact supported by evidence.
2001-CA-001546.pdf
Size: 77 kb
Date: 1/17/2003
Not To Be Published
Barnes v. Commonwealth
Criminal Law, Consent Search, Grand Jury Testimony
Crimes relating to anhydrous ammonia equipment (used for methampetamine production) are constitutional. Automobile seach based on valid consent, and judge had substantial findings of fact at pretrial suppression hearing.  Although law enforcement testimony at grand jury may have been misleading, it was not intentional and sufficient testimony existed to support indictment.
2001-CA-001771
Size: 32 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Dinsmore v. Commonwealth
Criminal Law, Sentencing
Affirmed amended sentence by judge who corrected sentence following 60.02 motion of defendant.  No hearing required since relief granted.  (eg., murder not subject to PFO enhancement).
2001-CA-001801
Size: 30 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Stewart v. Galen of Kentucky
Negligence, Hospital, Experts
Summary judgment against plaintiff reversed. Patient at hospital under a 'fall safety protocol' did not need expert testimony and presented jury issue on facts that bed check alarm not function, patient had gotten up before, and was injured when she got up again and fell on floor in her own defecation.  There was expert testimony in the record that purpose of bed check alarm was to notify nurse that patient had left bed.  If had functioned properly, then fall could have been prevented.  This was Jefferson Cir. Ct. case with Jeff Sampson for Plf and Todd Thompson for Suburban Hospital. 
2001-CA-001846
Size: 53 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
City of Louisville v. Lumpkins, Minor
Civil Rights, Hostile Work Environment
Trial court refused to give city's requested jury instructions which contained interrogatories on factual allegations in support of hostile work environment suffered by African-American minors working at city pool.  Appeals court summarized law on hostile work environment and reversed based on erroneous instructions. Even though the trial court committed no error refusing the city's instructions (which focused on individual incidents rather than totality of of the circumstances).  However, court's instructions correctly summarized the law except for omitting requirement that an isolated incident, unless extremely serious, is insufficient to create a hostile work environment.  Jefferson Cir. Ct., Clayton, J.; Glenn Cohen and Cynthia Effinger for injured minors; Lisa Schweickart for city on appeal.  For what it is worth, the instructions are in the opinion for use/modification.
2001-CA-002005.pdf
Size: 60 kb
Date: 1/17/2003
Not To Be Published
Orkin v. Joiner
Arbitration Agreements
Claims under Consumer Protection Act fall within arbitration agreement in contract for termite treatment.  Party's ignorance of rules of American Arbitration Assn. do not render agreement unenforceable. KRS 417.160(1) does not include errors at law as basis for setting aside arbitrator's decision. Although no decision yet on palpable error as basis for setting aside award, the errors raised here were not to that level.  Waivers of liability do not violate public policy and may contract away future negligence if not willful and wanton & resultant in personal injury.
2001-CA-002055
Size: 37 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Barnes v. Kentucky Retirement System
State Retirement, Time for Filing for Benefits
Claimant filed beyond one-year fpr disability retirement benefits.  Claim denied by Administrative Appeals Committee, but it had no authority to act for Board of Trustees.  Remanded.
2001-CA-002238.pdf
Size: 101 kb
Date: 1/17/2003
Not To Be Published
Springer v. Commonwealth
Criminal Law, Directed Verdict, Lay Testimony, Relevant Evidence
Marijuana found in in-mates locker and subsequently convicted of promoting contraband. Multiple issues on appeal regarding guard's testimony on age of marijuana cigarette, relevance of negative drug test following seizure, no double jeopardy for prison disciplinary proceeding, etc. etc. etc.
2001-CA-002281
Size: 32 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Wilson v. Wilson
Child Support, Modification
Placing child in hospital or nursing facility is no basis to terminate or modify support; disabled child has need in excess of those expenses merely covered by insurance. 
2001-CA-002291
Size: 58 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Northfield Ins. Co. v. First Nat'l Bank & Trust
Insurance, Endorsements, 
Summary judgment reversed and granted in favor of other party!  Attempted retroactive endorsement to policy after loss from arson to name bank as an additional insured (mortgagee/loss payee) was not given legal effect, and insurance company won coverage issue.  Houseboat manufacturer had commercial insurance which did not name the bank as a loss payee when fire erupted (major loss of property).  Insurance company ruled arson and denied coverage. However, this does not affect a loss payee so they tried to amend the policy retroactively which would have allowed the bank to be paid on its note since the arson by the insured would not have affected the bank's benefits under the policy.  Judge ruled in summary judgment in favor of bank, court of appeals reversed and granted summary judgment on appeal favoring insurance company.  (Nice try, but retroactive endorsement not work.)
2001-CA-002331
Size: 43 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Hudson & Hudson v. Ayars
Real Property, Prescriptive Easements, Adverse Possession Abandoned Property
2001-CA-002434
Size: 52 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Commonwealth (Agriculture Dept) v. Vinson
Whistleblower
Affirmed jury's award of punitive damages of $2,000,002 and reinstatement to former positions.  No need to analyze punitive award under federal constitutional principles since state is not a "person."
2001-CA-002478
Size: 34 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Caldwell v. Hall
Real Estate, Royalties, Minerals
Case dealt with interest in heirs and grantees to mineral rights of property and royalties to be paid accordingly.
2002-CA-000036
Size: 44 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Park v. Coleman Oil, Inc.
Negligence, Duty to Provide Security, Summary Judgment
Store proprietor is not the insurer of the safety of his guests, and the existence of duty owed is question of law. Customer was a victim of robbery at Hager Hill Happy Mart.  Summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's claims affirmed as Plaintiff did not demonstrate foreseeability that he would more likely be a robbery victim at Happy Mart than anywhere else.  
2002-CA-000091
Size: 46 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Johnson v. General Assembly
Criminal Law, Class Action, Statutory Interpretation, Civil Rights
Pro se inmate filed class action lawsuit following his conviction claiming civil rights violations for consecutive sentences.  Lost.
2002-CA-000096
Size: 33 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Collier v. Commonwealth
PFO, Juveniles
Addressed issues relating to proof the PFO was not a minor when convicted of prior felonies.
2002-CA-000117.pdf
Size: 53 kb
Date: 1/17/2003
Not To Be Published
Nuck v. Nuck
Family Law, Child Support, Arrearages
Set aside credits given by trial court for child support arrearages during periods of custody; relief from child support obligations (per Price v. Price may only be granted prospectively.
2002-CA-000245.pdf
Size: 59 kb
Date: 1/17/2003
Not To Be Published
Ebbs v. TARC
Directed Verdict, Negligence
Reversed directed verdict in favor of TARC bus driver concluding jury might reasonably have found greater degree of caution would have avoided accident and was negligent in pulling away from curb.
2002-CA-000273
Size: 44 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Kimmel v. Progress Paint Man. Co.
Employment Contract, Commissions, Summary Judgment
Case dealt with commissions from sales following alleged improper termination of employment.  Kentucky is employment at will state unless parties expressly manifest intention to do otherwise.  Contract interpreted not to be a yearly contract of employment.  Defective product credits not subject to commissions.
2002-CA-000290
Size: 27 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Williams v. Commonwealth
Criminal Law
2002-CA-000532
Size: 33 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
McAinch v. Pittman
Child Custody
Affirmed judges change of custody when mother could not protect child from step-parent.
2002-CA-000593
Size: 47 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Whittaker v. Spencer
Workers Compensation
Affirmed increase in occupational disablity; also addressed credits on reopening of claim.
2002-CA-000796.pdf
Size: 66 kb
Date: 1/17/2003
Not To Be Published
Sosa v. Irving Materials
Summary Judgment, Unauthorized Practice of Law
Affirmed summary judgment dismissing claims of father for property damage since he had already settled and dismissal of daughter's claims prosecuted pursued in in the father's own name by father due to unauthorized practice of law.
2002-CA-001150
Size: 66 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Owensboro v. Adams
Workers Compensation, Scientific Evidence
Daubert standard for scientific evidence applies to Workers Compensation cases, and expert testimony regarding trigeminal neuralgia was sufficient to support causation finding by ALJ in reopening workers comp case.
2002-CA-001392
Size: 41 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Modified 12/20/2002 decision
Fouch v. Island Fork Construction
Workers Compensation, Black Lung
2002-CA-001437
Size: 47 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Fairbanks Coal v. Collins
Workers Compensation,  Appellate Review
2002-CA-001538
Size: 68 kb 
Date:
1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Commonwealth v. Ward
Criminal Law
2002-CA-001588
Size: 60 kb
Date: 1/9/2003
Not To Be Published
Caspar v. Superior Care Home
Workers Compensation, Cervical Spine & Degenerative Disk
The Kentucky Appellate decisions are 'linked' to the Kentucky Court of Justice Site.  Adobe Acrobat Reader is needed.  These links may change with time.  In addition, the following disclaimer regarding published/not to be published decisions is provided for you:

Unpublished Opinions

This web site (AOC at http://www.KyCourts.net) contains both published and unpublished opinions of the Kentucky Supreme Court and Kentucky Court of Appeals. First, opinions that are labeled "NOT TO BE PUBLISHED" shall never be cited or used as authority in any other case in any court of this state. CR 76.28(4)(c). This is true even after the unpublished opinions become final. Secondly, although opinions labeled "TO BE PUBLISHED" may be cited as authority in any court of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, the opinions shall not be cited until all steps in the appellate process have been exhausted and they become final. As of the date Court of Appeals opinions were placed on the web site, none were final.

 2002 Year In Review - Kentucky Trial Court Review (Jury Verdicts for 2002) - Table of Contents

  • Summaries and Totals
    • Combined Verdicts for this year and last five year totals
    • Million $$ Dollar Verdicts
  • Case Type Reports
    • Auto Negligence
    • UIM-UM
    • Threshold Verdicts
    • Seatbelt Defense
    • Slip and Fall
    • Medical Negligence
    • General Negligence
    • Sexual Harassment
    • False Imprisonment, Malicious Prosecution
    • Civil Rights
    • Assault
    • Products Liability
    • Wal-Mart
    • Bad Faith
    • Animal - Dog Bites
    • Death
    • FELA
    • Defamation
  • Damage Reports
    • Injury Multipliers
    • Permanent Impairment Awards
    • Loss of Consortium
    • Punitive Damages
  • Expert Reports
    • Common attorney/IME batteries
    • Results
    • Trends
  • Miscellaneous Topics
    • Most Prolific Lawyers & Law Firms
    • Juries That Disdain Pain and Suffering - Murphy v. Swift
    • Jury Questions from 2002
    • Attorneys - litigants and parties
    • Punitives - Justice Cooper's dissent in Sand Hill
    • Damages - Miller v. Fratzke
    • Updating Slip and Fall Ghost
    • How much was it worth in 1965?
    • Verdicts Revisted in 2002 - redux.
  • Index Report
    • County
    • Judge
    • Attorney
  • Case Index
  • Why would you need the Year In Review (YIR)?  I already get the issues every month?  I don't do that much personal injury work anyway.
    • Well, the YIR organizes and indexes them in a useful fashion, not to mention puts them in a single useful volume.  For the same reason published appellate decisions without a digest or means of researching is of little use, the same goes for the jury verdicts.
    • The experienced practitioner needs to know the value of his case to maximize representation of his client, just as the occasional BI lawyer.  Knowing the landscape before taking the case is just as important as knowing it for eventual settlement.
    • During mediation, the YIR is used by both defense and plaintiff's lawyers for realistic evaluations with unrealistic clients, parties, insurance adjusters, attorneys, and yes - mediators.
    • Puts many issues in perspective such as grouping various types of cases together in order to evaluate - punitives, consortium, discovery, injury multipliers.
    • Good practical insight into issues that are popping up at trial.  For example, you got a UIM case and wonder how they have been developing.  Are they beating the UIM floor?  How are they developing against the various carriers?  What are some of the trial issues that have affected other attorneys?  Need to ask another lawyer who has tried these for tips, tricks, and traps or even forms, motions, instructions.  Great way to start your preparation.
    • Valuation - The injury multipliers may not be the final answer in case evaluation, but they are a start.  

    • There are more reasons, but I just wanted to ramble a little bit.  Although there is a lot of editorializing and opinions, there is even more raw data that helps. And for the price of $185.00 it's like have a trial consultant at your fingertips.

 

 Is "Tort Reform' Coming to Kentucky?

  • Vote in on-line poll 
  • We need more participation - only 50 votes so far
  • We got an additional 30 folks to vote last week.  I must say I am surprised by the numbers since I thought attorneys would be overwhelming AGAINST caps on pain and suffering and punitive damages.  Go figure.
  • See the ABA proposal for limiting medical awards
  • This is the last week for this poll on tort reform, please put in your 2 cents if you have not already done so. Don't vote twice.
  • Results as of this date (1/18/2003):

    Results

    Do you favor limiting the amount of recovery for noneconomic damges (pain and suffering) in medical malpractice cases?

    No (67%)

    Yes (33%)
    49 total votes

    Do you favor limiting the amount of recovery for punitive damages in medical malpractice cases?

    No (57%)

    Yes (43%)
    50 total votes

    Do you favor mandatory alternative dispute resolution in medical malpractice cases?

    No (52%)

    Yes (48%)
    50 total votes

    Do you believe the current laws need to be changed to provide for a uniform statute of limitations in medical malpractice cases?

    Yes (54%)

    No (46%)
    48 total votes

  • Next poll will be to allow you to judge the judges.  The cost is nothing compared to the thousands of dollars paid in the LBA survey ($12,626 for the 2002 Judicial Evaluation of the judges of Jefferson Circuit Court, U.S. District Court, and U.S. Bankruptcy Court).
  • Return to Top

 LIST MAINTENANCE