Issue 2002/10

Sept. 29, 2002

 

 

 
Home
Kentucky Law
Louisville
Lawyers
Law Topics
Directories
Search
The Kentucky 
Lawyer Main Page
News & 
References
Louisville
LawWire
LouisvilleLaw
News Archives
 
Search Kentucky 
Lawyer  News by
Key Words
 
 

 

KENTUCKY eLEGAL SUMMARIES
Short (very short) summaries of cases and news

Return to LawWire Index


KENTUCKY SUPREME COURT
Sept. 29, 2002

  • CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
    • McCLURE V. AUGUSTUS
      Ky., Sept. 26, 2002
      The scheme for terminating the employment of deputy sheriffs established in the Deputy-Sheriff Merit Board statutes, KRS 70.260 et seq., is  not an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers doctrine.
  • CRIMINAL LAW
    • COMMONWEALTH V. PLOWMAN
      Ky., Sept. 26, 2002.
      A bulldozer is a "vehicle" within the definition of a "building" under KRS 513.010 for purposes of the arson statutes.
    • HOLBROOKS V. COMMONWEALTH
      Ky., Sept. 26, 2002.
      Mistrial in which defendant convicted of misdemeanor perjury but jury was unable to agree to punishment is double jeopardy to subsequent conviction of felony perjury.
    • LAWSON V. COMMONWEALTH
      Ky., Sept. 26, 2002 
      It is not harmless error to deprive jury of opportunity to make recommendation whether sentences readjusted by trial court to correct previous error  run concurrently or consecutive, even though juries' determinations as to that issue are merely recommendations.
    • ROARK V. COMMONWEALTH
      Ky. Sept. 26, 2002
      The "totality of circumstances" approach is adopted for evaluating the admissibility of evidence that is the product of an hypnotically induced, refreshed or enhanced recollection which neither automatically admits nor excludes posthypnosis evidence but determines admissibility on a case-by-case basis from the "totality of the circumstances."
    • ROGERS V. COMMONWEALTH
      Ky., Sept. 26, 2002.
      • Use of polygraph alone (no physical abuse, coercion, etc) to elicit confession from mentally retarded defendant does not violate 14th Amendment due process.  Appellant's mental retardation is a factor to consider in assessing the voluntariness of a confession, but "the mere existence of a mental condition, by itself and apart from its relation to police coercion, does not make a statement constitutionally involuntary."
      • Although polygraph evidence is not admissible in Kentucky, a defendant--and only the defendant-- has the right, as a matter of trial strategy, to bring evidence of a polygraph examination before the jury to inform the jury as to the circumstances in which a confession was made.
      • Issue of expert testimony regarding voluntariness of confession of mentally retarded defendant remanded for judge to consider under FRE 702.
  • JAILS, MEDICAL CARE FOR INDIGENTS
    • COUNTY OF HARLAN V. APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HOSP.
      Ky.,Sept. 26, 2002
      County jailer as custodian of the prisoners requires him to take the necessary steps to seek an indigency determination regarding the provision of medical care and not the hospital providing that care.
  • JUDICIAL ETHICS
    • In re MAZE
      Ky., Sept. 26, 2002
      Reversed informal opinion of Judicial Ethics Commission that Judge Beth Lewis Maze could not participate in a program sponsored by the American Council of Young Political Leaders (ACYPL). 
  • JURISDICTION, IN PERSONAM
    • WILSON V. CASE
      Ky., Sept. 26, 2002.
      Court examined the minimum contacts test for personal jurisdiction arising from out-of-state resident whose only contact with Kentucky was to come to Louisville and fly a plane back to Maryland where he crashed it - Kentucky did not have personal jurisdiction after applying the following tests: (1) whether the defendant purposefully availed himself of the privilege of acting within the forum state or causing a consequence in the forum state (2) whether the cause of action arises from the alleged in-state activities (3)requires such connections to the state as to make jurisdiction reasonable.  Each of these three criteria represents a separate requirement, and jurisdiction will lie only where all three are satisfied.
  • STATUTORY INTERPRETATION, ZONING
    • STRINGER V. REALTY UNLIMITED
      Ky. Sept. 26, 2002
      Upheld zoning ordinance and 'may not be permitted' is not permissive but prohibitive.
  • CAMPBELL V. CITY OF BOONEVILLE
    Ky. Sept. 26, 2002.
    Claimaint was voluntarily intoxicated when he was responding to a call in his police cruiser and had a motor vehicle accident.  Therefore, benefits denied.

KENTUCKY COURT OF APPEALS - PUBLISHED 
Sept. 29, 2002

  • CIVIL PROCEDURE, COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL
    • MCNEELY V. SPENCER
      Ky.App., Sept. 27, 2002
      Affirmed summary judgment. The doctrine of collateral estoppel precludes the relitigation of the issue of legal negligence in civil case.  Denial of criminal appeal for ineffective assistance of counsel serves as collateral estoppel of civil legal malpractice claim.
  • JUVENILES
    • D.R.T. v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY 
      Ky.App., Sept.  27, 2002 
      Juvenile court lacks authority to order confinement in adult detention facilities of juveniles who turned eighteen years of age between the dates they committed public offenses and the dates upon which the juvenile courts conducted dispositional hearings.
Return to Top
LIST MAINTENANCE

 

Return to Top

 

 

View your CLE credits online

 

 

 

 
 

Disclaimer

          We are not attempting to practice law, give advice or represent ourselves as anything more than a resource portal with many unique features. Our design is copyrighted. We have no claim of any affiliation with any linked website nor any liability for anything they may say or do. We, and our contributing authors, offer no warranties of any type, to anyone, about anything express or implied.  What you see is what you get, we cannot afford to be your insurer and most assuredly are not your lawyer and do not render you any legal advice whatsoever.  No attorney client relationship is established by this site, and there is absolutely no confidentiality of any information or communication herein.  No emails received will be responded to pertaining to legal questions or advice.

          By going further into this site, you accept this complete waiver of all warranties and acknowledge reading our Legal Disclaimer.  

©  2001-2004 LouisvilleLaw, LouisvilleLaw.com & Kentucky Law Net, LLC
  
"The Kentucky Lawyer" is a registered Service Mark of Kentucky Law Net LLC. 

 LouisvilleLaw, LouisvilleLaw.com, Louisville LawWire, eLegal Summaries & LouisvilleLawyers  are service marks and the intellectual property of Kentucky Law Net LLC. 2001-2004

 To Suggest a Link or Report broken Links, please contact our Webmaster

 
Number of Hits Since June 1, 2001
 

 

 Kentucky, legal news, legal, law, information, lawyers, lawyer, attorney, attorneys, verdicts, settlements, cases, court, courts, judge, judges