Issue 2002/1

  Index 

 

 

 
Home
Kentucky Law
Louisville
Lawyers
Law Topics
Directories
Search
The Kentucky 
Lawyer Main Page
News & 
References
Louisville
LawWire
LouisvilleLaw
News Archives
 
Search Kentucky 
Lawyer  News by
Key Words
 
 

 

Kentucky Appellate Case Summaries and other stuff


 

KENTUCKY COURT OF APPEALS AND SUPREME COURT SUMMARIES 
PUBLISHED CASES FROM JAN 1 - FEB 28, 2002

AUTOMOBILES
Ellis v. Browning Pontiac
2000-CA-002772-MR
Ky.App., 2002.
February 15, 2002. 

Auto dealer who choose to file certificate of title,  must do so  promptly. A delay of thirty-nine days after the necessary documents were executed at time of sale is not prompt.  Auto dealer was the owner of the vehicle on the date of the accident. (Note - Court did not address liability of dealer for selling vehicle to buyer who had only had a permit; and net effect of ownership is that dealer’s garage policy is applicable).

 CONTRACTS
Inn Group Management Services, Inc. v. Greer
1999-CA-002781-MR
Ky.App., 2002.
January 25, 2002.

 Hotel management company brought action to collect management agreement cancellation fee and contractual attorney fees and costs against third parties for whom it agreed to provide management services. The Court of Appeals held (1) substantial evidence supported jury verdict awarding hotel management company less than the full amount of the cancellation fee, and (2) reasonableness of attorney fees and costs was a question of law for the court, rather than a question of fact for the jury.

CRIMINAL LAW
Commonwealth v. Bryant
2001-CA-000264-MR
Ky.App., 2002.
January 25, 2002. 

Appeal of dismissal of an indictment for possession of chemicals or equipment with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine on grounds that KRS 218A.1432(1)(b) is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. Court helt it is neither unconstitutionally vague nor overbroad and, thus, reverse and remand.

Eldridge v. Commonwealth
2000-CA-002379-DG
Ky.App., 2002.
February 8, 2002

 BAT results should not be suppressed.  Court rejected defendant’s argument that  the breath alcohol test results should be suppressed (1) because the police officer administering the test failed to observe him for the required twenty-minute period prior to administering the test, and (2) because a new observation period was not conducted after he removed his dentures during the initial observation period because the trial court's finding that the police officer observed Eldridge for the required time is supported by substantial evidence, and because a new observation period was not required after Eldridge removed his dentures.

Estep v. Commonwealth
1999-SC-0814-DG
Ky., 2002.
January 17, 2002.

 Following reversal of initial conviction, defendant was again convicted of reckless homicide at second jury trial.  Defendant appealed to the the Supreme Court which held that: (1) Commonwealth was not entitled to "missing evidence" instruction concerning repossession of defendant's vehicle that precluded further examination for evidence that victim may have fired at defendant; (2) improper "missing evidence" instruction permitting inference in favor of Commonwealth was not harmless; and (3) failure to inform jury that burden was on Commonwealth to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant, when he shot victim, was not privileged to act in self-protection was prejudicial error. Reversed Court of Appeals and remanded for new trial.

 DISCIPLINARY

Kentucky Bar Association v. Carrithers
64 S.W.3d 290
Ky., 2002.
January 17, 2002.

 Attorney's failure to pursue claims for medical malpractice and collection on behalf of client warranted a 30-day suspension from practice of law, not just a public reprimand, in light of fact that conduct caused statute of limitations to run on the potential malpractice claim.

 Kentucky Bar Association v. Chinn
64 S.W.3d 289
Ky., 2002.
January 17, 2002 

Attorney's failure to diligently pursue client's bankruptcy case, failure to communicate with client, and failure to return client's file and unused portion of advanced fee warranted 30-day suspension.

 Kentucky Bar Association v. Evans
2001-SC-0942-KB
Ky., 2002.
January 17, 2002. 

Attorney showed sufficient cause for his non-compliance with Continuing Legal Education (CLE) requirement for ethics credits.


Kentucky Bar Association v. Greene
63 S.W.3d 182
Ky., 2002.
January 17, 2002.

 Requirements that attorney satisfy outstanding judgment of former client against attorney in malpractice action, that attorney reimburse former client for court costs incurred, and  that attorney pay costs for disciplinary proceedings warranted 90-day suspension for  attorney misconduct. 

Kentucky Bar Association v. Hartlage
2001-SC-0429-KB,
January 17, 2002.

 Attorney's failure to notify clients that their actions for medical malpractice were dismissed for failure to prosecute warranted one-year suspension.

 Yopp v. Kentucky Bar Association
64 S.W.3d 287
Ky., 2002.
January 17, 2002.

 Attorney's conduct in failing to file client's collection action and in failing to communicate adequately with client warranted 30-day suspension, consecutive with 30-day sentence provided for in earlier disciplinary proceeding.

 

DOMESTIC RELATIONS

Barnett v. Wiley
2000-CA-002034-MR
Ky.App., 2002.
February 1, 2002. 

Petitioner who had five-year relationship with respondent was a member of an unmarried couple and  had standing to seek a domestic violence order against respondent

Kelley v. Fedde,.
2000-SC-0451-DG
Ky., 2002
January 17, 2002.

Custodial parent's failure to object to circuit court's ruling without hearing did not waive right to hearing on her objections to Domestic Relations Commission's report recommending joint custody.  Since transcripts had not been filed prior to circuit court's ruling, parent had no reason to believe that decision was about to be rendered without complete record as requested by both parties.

 Sherfey v. Sherfey
2001-CA-000519-MR
Ky.App., 2002.
January 18, 2002.

 Substantial evidence supported trial court's decision awarding custody of child to paternal grandparents.  Child’s one month absence at camp planned secretly by parent did not disqualify grand-parents from ‘de facto’ custodian status and the non-consensual transportation by father was domestic violence rather than abandonment.

 Terwilliger v. Terwilliger
No. 1999-SC-1064-DG, January 17, 2002 As Modified February 11, 2002.

Held (1) husband's knowing undervaluation of marital assets was a fraud affecting the proceedings that justified reopening the property settlement, and (2) husband's failure to trace assets to a separate property source rendered the assets as marital property.

  

INSURANCE

Baker v. Kentucky Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co.
2001-CA-000942-MR, February 22, 2002.

 Driver not entitled to UIM (underinsured motorist coverage) for personal injuries from accident without physical contact with unknown driver.  Court rejected argument that the trial court should presume the existence of minimum tort liability limits for the unknown driver and unidentified vehicle causing her accident and allow her to recover damages to the extent they may exceed those presumed minimum liability limits. (Please note that if there had been contact, then UM (uninsured motorist) coverage would have applied if available under the policy).

NEGLIGENCE
Barnette v. Hospital of Louisa, Inc.
No. 2000-CA-002290-MR., January 4, 2002

Employee brought tort action against employer for injuries sustained from a fall at work. The Circuit Court granted summary judgment in favor of employer. Employee appealed. The Court of Appeals held employee's act of picking up her paycheck was a work-related activity that was covered under the Workers' Compensation Act.

 

OPEN RECORDS
Meriwether v. Lexington Fayette Urban County Government
No. 2000-CA-002050-MR.
January 4, 2002.

Former county government employee brought action against county government to access various records pursuant to Open Records Act after county asserted that certain documents were privileged and, thus, were not subject to disclosure. The Fayette Circuit Court denied most of employee's request. Employee appealed. The Court of Appeals held (1) withheld records were privileged and, thus, were not subject to Open Records Act request; (2) county and its attorney did not waive privileges by having attorney interview employee in the absence of counsel; (3) attorney who worked in an investigatory capacity was entitled to assert attorney privileges; (4) privilege extended to investigatory materials in attorney's file; (5) custodian of records acted in compliance with Open Records Act; and (6) employee was not entitled to award of attorney fees and costs.

 

TAX
Woodward, Hobson & Fulton, L.L.P. v. Revenue Cabinet
No. 2000-CA-002784-MR, February 22, 2002.

Law firm is not required to pay use tax upon charges for photocopies of medical and hospital records acquired from out- of-state providers in connection with litigation.

 WORKERS COMPENSATION

Scott v. Fruit of the Loom
2001-CA-000999-WC, February 22, 2002

 ALJ should have considered claimant’s  prior active occupational disability attributable to work-related (neck injuries), but time-barred, injuries.

 Whittaker v. Sherrill
2001-CA-001249-WC
Ky.App., 2002.
February 15, 2002

 The 425-week benefit period began on the date of the original settlement agreement  

Return to Top

 


KENTUCKY COURT OF APPEALS - UNPUBLISHED DECISIONS
JAN/FEB 2002

Civil Procedure - Default Judgment

Defendant's miscommunication with its insurer resulting in failure to answer complaint is excusable neglect; affirmed setting aside default judgment. 3 Ky.Npo. 5 at 3.

Civil Procedure - Peremptory Challenges

Even when two medical defendants share a common theory of the case, each may be awarded peremptory challenges when trial positions are not identical. 3 Ky.Npo. 1 at 2

Civil Procedure - Failure to Prosecute

Case properly dismissed for failure to prosecute when plaintiff took no action during 33-month period beyond deposing defendant. 3 Ky.Npo. 1 at 23

Domestic Relations

Bad faith in visitation matters is not sufficient alone to merit custody modification. 3 Ky.Npo. 2 at 11.

Experts

Social worker not competent to testify as to psychiatric negligence and summary judgment for doctors affirmed. 3 Ky.Npo. 2 at 3.

Experts

Accident reconstructionist may properly testify as to the point of impact in a disputed center-of-line crash. 3 Ky.Npo. 2 at 8.

Legal Negligence

No privity for legal malpractice action if third-party not beneficiary of attorney's work. 3 Ky.Npo. 1 at 19

Legal Negligence

Reversed dismissal of claim against attorneys on statute of limitations as fact issues existed as to when wife should have discovered her attorney failed to prepare QDRO regarding husband's pension (husband suddenly retired and took full pension in violation of property settlement agreement). 3 Ky.Npo. 1 at 14

Medical Malpractice

Expert testimony needed in med-mal case alleging failure to anesthetize prior to surgery resulting in plaintiff/patient's feeling incision - not within 'laymen's exception'. 3 Ky.Npo. 5 at 17.

Negligence - Slip and Fall

Uneven step at shopping center was open and obvious - summary judgment dismissing claim affirmed. 3 Ky.Npo. 5 at 16.

Revival

Dismissal affirmed for personal representative's failure to revive an action within one year of death. 3 Ky.Npo. 4 at 12.

Subrogation

Insurer may not recover its subrogation interests from worker until injured worker is made whole. 3 Ky.Npo. 2 at 9.

Non-published decisions may not be cited as authority in Kentucky Courts per CR 76.28.

All citations are to the Kentucky Appellate Non-Published Opinions. More complete listing of cases and full text of opinions available bi-monthly from Kentucky Appellate Non-Published Opinions, 9642 Brownsboro Road, No. 133, Louisville, KY 40241; telephone (502)326-9794 or (877)3313-1944 for $130.00 + tax. Summaries herein printed with permission of Ky.Npo.


SELECTED TID BITS FROM KENTUCKY TRIAL COURT REVIEW - FEB. 2002

$1.1 MILLION BAD FAITH TRIAL IN JEFFERSON COUNTY - 6 KTCR 2 @ 1.

Teen age girl killed by the reckless driving of another teen resulted in $1 million in punitives. Insurer (USAA) represented both parties and delayed paying liability and UIM benefits. USAA finally offered the liability limits of $100,000 but failed to mention the UIM coverage. The offer was declined. The UIM benefits of $300,000 were then offered later. A bench trial resulted in $2.3 million verdict against tort feasor. Post-verdict - individual defendants (USAA's liability insured) threw in $50,000 in addition to the policy limits of $100,000 AND assigned the estate the bad faith claim against USAA. Bottom line was USAA knew almost immediately the claim was worth the liability limits, but did nothing. Phase 2 was the bad faith trial resulting in $100,000 plus $1 million in punitives. Failure to pay all of the benefits due promptly recklessly exposed the insured to an excess judgment.

$3.3 MILLION MED-MAL TRIAL IN JEFFERSON COUNTY - 6 KTCR 2 @ 7

Norton's nurses' failure to note complications from the administration of Picotin results in infant's brain damage. Poor communication with doctor about infant's distress after Picotin cricized.

$218,326 MED-MAL VERDICT IN JEFFERSON COUNTY - 6 KTCR 2 @ 14

Doctor who failed to respond to 'stat' page partially to blame in patient's death at Jewish Hospital.

To order your copy of the Kentucky Trial Court Review - http://www.LouisvilleLaw.com/kyverdicts/index.htm or call 877-313-1944.

Return to Top

 

 

View your CLE credits online

 

 

 


 

 
 

Disclaimer

          We are not attempting to practice law, give advice or represent ourselves as anything more than a resource portal with many unique features. Our design is copyrighted. We have no claim of any affiliation with any linked website nor any liability for anything they may say or do. We, and our contributing authors, offer no warranties of any type, to anyone, about anything express or implied.  What you see is what you get, we cannot afford to be your insurer and most assuredly are not your lawyer and do not render you any legal advice whatsoever.  No attorney client relationship is established by this site, and there is absolutely no confidentiality of any information or communication herein.  No emails received will be responded to pertaining to legal questions or advice.

          By going further into this site, you accept this complete waiver of all warranties and acknowledge reading our Legal Disclaimer.  

©  2001-2004 LouisvilleLaw, LouisvilleLaw.com & Kentucky Law Net, LLC
  
"The Kentucky Lawyer" is a registered Service Mark of Kentucky Law Net LLC. 

 LouisvilleLaw, LouisvilleLaw.com, Louisville LawWire, eLegal Summaries & LouisvilleLawyers  are service marks and the intellectual property of Kentucky Law Net LLC. 2001-2004

 To Suggest a Link or Report broken Links, please contact our Webmaster

 
Number of Hits Since June 1, 2001
 

 

 kentucky, legal news, legal, law, information, lawyers, lawyer, attorney, attorneys, verdicts, settlements, cases, court, courts, judge, judges