Need a Louisville Lawyer? 
Click here.

Kentucky Rules of Evidence
Index

Unannotated
 
To Search the Kentucky Rules of Evidence
 Using a Key Word Search Click here
 

Article I - General Provisions

Article II - Judicial Notice

Article III - Presumptions in Civil Actions and Proceedings

Article IV -Relevancy and Related Subjects

Article V - Privileges

Article VI - Witnesses

Article VII - Opinions and Expert Testimony

Article VIII - Hearsay

Article IX - Authentication and Identification

Article X - Contents of Writings, Recordings and Photographs

Article XI - Miscellaneous Rules

Legislative Research Commission Note

Study Committee Prefatory Note for KRE

 

Article I - General Provisions
Study Committee's Prefatory Note

Top of Page

Article II - Judicial Notice

Top of Page

Article III - Presumptions in Civil Actions and Proceeding

Top of Page

Article IV -Relevancy and Related Subjects

Top of Page

Article V - Privileges

Top of Page

Article VI - Witnesses

Top of Page

Article VII - Opinions and Expert Testimony

Top of Page

Article VIII - Hearsay

Top of Page

Article IX - Authentication and Identification

Top of Page

Article X - Contents of Writings, Recordings and Photographs

Top of Page

Article XI - Miscellaneous Rules

Top of Page

Legislative Research Commission Note

(7-1-92): Although denominated "rules," the elements of the Kentucky Rules of Evidence were enacted as statutes by the Kentucky General Assembly. See 1990 Ky. Acts ch. 88; 1992 Ky. Acts ch. 324. Originally codified as KRS Chapter 422A in 1990, the Kentucky Rules of Evidence were renumbered by the Reviser of Statutes, effective July 1, 1992, pursuant to 1992 Ky. Acts ch. 324, sec. 34. By an order dated May 12, 1992, the Kentucky Supreme Court "adopt [ed] so much of the Kentucky Rules of Evidence as enacted by HB 241 [1992 Ky. Acts ch. 324] as comes within the rule making power of the Court, pursuant to Ky. Const. sec. 116."  KRE 406, 502, and 704 are being reserved for future use.

Top of Page

Study Committee's Prefatory Note:

  1. The objective of the Study Committee was to draft evidence rules for in in the courts of the Commonwealth of Kentucky.  An early decision was made by the Committee to strive for uniformity with the Federal Rules of Evidence and to propose a departure from the Federal Rules only for good reason.  Uniformity between the state and federal rules would serve the purpose of minimizing the possibility of forum shopping and would in time add to the efficiency of the judicial system.  The Federal Rules have been in operation since 1975; several states have adopted Rules patterned after the Federal Rules.  As a result there is a substantial and growing body of case law construing these Rules, case law which can be of invaluable assistance in the application of a new set of evidence rules for Kentucky.

  2. Most codes of evidence adopted for use in this country contain only broad general rules of evidence law; leaving the judiciary room to flesh out the general rules through appellate opinions.  (The Federal Rules are certainly of this type.)  With this in mind, the Study Committee carefully prepared for each rule a commentary which should be used in application and construction of that rule.  In preparing the commentary the Committee utilized the official notes of the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules, the reports of the Congressional Committees which considered the Federal Rules, and cases construing the Federal Rules.  In noting this use the Study Committee intends to imply that courts should make reference to these materials in using the Committee's own commentary to the new Kentucky Rules, a commentary designed to do the following things: (1) provide a brief description of the particular rule to which it relates;  (2) explain differences between the state and federal rules;  and (3) provide necessary comparisons between preexisting law and the new rules.

  3. In promulgating these rules an attempt was made to amend all other Rules of Court with incompatible provisions.   To the extent inconsistency survives this effort, the Kentucky Rules of Evidence should be regarded as superseding contrary provisions in the Kentucky Rules of Criminal and Civil Procedure.  These Rules should be determinative of all issues concerning the admissibility of evidence in the trial of civil and criminal cases.

Top of Page


Disclaimer

          We are not attempting to practice law, give advice or represent ourselves as anything more than a resource portal with many unique features. Our design is copyrighted. We have no claim of any affiliation with any linked website nor any liability for anything they may say or do. We, and our contributing authors, offer no warranties of any type, to anyone, about anything express or implied.  What you see is what you get, we cannot afford to be your insurer and most assuredly are not your lawyer and do not render you any legal advice whatsoever.  No attorney client relationship is established by this site, and there is absolutely no confidentiality of any information or communication herein.  No emails received will be responded to pertaining to legal questions or advice.

          By going further into this site, you accept this complete waiver of all warranties and acknowledge reading our Legal Disclaimer.  

©  2001-2004 LouisvilleLaw, LouisvilleLaw.com & Kentucky Law Net, LLC
  
"The Kentucky Lawyer" is a registered Service Mark of Kentucky Law Net LLC. 

 LouisvilleLaw, LouisvilleLaw.com, Louisville LawWire, eLegal Summaries & LouisvilleLawyers  are service marks and the intellectual property of Kentucky Law Net LLC. 2001-2004

 To Suggest a Link or Report broken Links, please contact our Webmaster

 
Number of Hits Since June 1, 2001
 

 

Click here for LawReader's Kentucky Trial Objections

 


KRE TABLE 
OF cONTENTS

Next