 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KENTUCKY
RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CR 49.01 SPECIAL VERDICTS The court may require a jury to return only a special verdict in the form of a special written finding upon each issue of fact. In that event the court may submit to the jury written questions susceptible of categorical or other brief answers or may submit written forms of the several special findings which might properly be made under the pleadings and evidence; or it may use such other method of submitting the issues and requiring the written findings thereon as it deems most appropriate. The court shall give to the jury such written instructions concerning the matter thus submitted as may be necessary to enable the jury to make its findings upon each issue. If in so doing the court omits any issue of fact raised by the pleadings or by the evidence, each party waives his right to a trial by jury of the issue so omitted unless before the jury retires he demands its submission to the jury. As to an issue omitted without such demand the court may make a finding; or, if it fails to do so, it shall be deemed to have made a finding in accord with the judgment on the special verdict. [Adopted eff. 7-1-53] CR 49.02 GENERAL VERDICT ACCOMPANIED BY ANSWER TO INTERROGATORIES The court may submit to the jury, together with appropriate forms for a general verdict, written interrogatories upon one or more issues of fact the decision of which is necessary to a verdict. The court shall give such written instructions as may be necessary to enable the jury both to make answers to the interrogatories and to render a general verdict, and the court shall direct the jury both to make written answers and to render a general verdict. When the general verdict and the answers are harmonious, the court shall direct the entry of the appropriate judgment upon the verdict and answers. When the answers are consistent with each other but one or more is inconsistent with the general verdict, the court may direct the entry of judgment in accordance with the answers, notwithstanding the general verdict, or may return the jury for further consideration of its answers and verdict or may order a new trial. When the answers are inconsistent with each other and one or more is likewise inconsistent with the general verdict, the court shall not direct the entry of judgment but may return the jury for further consideration of its answers and verdict or may order a new trial. [Adopted eff. 7-1-53] |
|
|
|
Disclaimer We are not attempting to practice law, give advice or represent ourselves as anything more than a resource portal with many unique features. Our design is copyrighted. We have no claim of any affiliation with any linked website nor any liability for anything they may say or do. We, and our contributing authors, offer no warranties of any type, to anyone, about anything express or implied. What you see is what you get, we cannot afford to be your insurer and most assuredly are not your lawyer and do not render you any legal advice whatsoever. No attorney client relationship is established by this site, and there is absolutely no confidentiality of any information or communication herein. No emails received will be responded to pertaining to legal questions or advice. By going further into this site, you accept this complete waiver of all warranties and acknowledge reading our Legal Disclaimer.
© 2001-2004 LouisvilleLaw,
LouisvilleLaw.com
& Kentucky Law Net, LLC
To Suggest a Link or Report broken Links, please contact our Webmaster |
|
|
|
 table of contents |
|
 Next |
|
 Previous |
|
|
